Kersti Kaljulaid

Former President of Estonia
and Member of the Board of Directors, GLOBSEC

About Speaker

Kersti Kaljulaid served as the President of the Republic of Estonia from 2016-2021. During her time in office, she made her presence felt in both her homeland and the international arena. Previously she had been serving as a Member of the European Court of Auditors, advising Prime Minister Mart Laar and holding diferent top level positions in energy, investment banking and telecom sector. Genetic engineer and economist by education, she has been a member of the Supervisory Board of the Estonian Genome Center and the Council Chair of the University of Tartu from 2012 to 2016. In summer 2021, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres appointed President Kaljulaid to the position of Global Advocate for the ‘Every Woman Every Child’ strategy on the health and well-being of women, children and adolescents around the world for the next two years. She was also the first Estonian to be featured in the Forbes World’s 100 Most Powerful Women. Kersti Kaljulaid has become a sought-after speaker at high-level forums on digital, security and foreign-policy topics and more broadly for analysing and interpreting societal and economic change. President Kaljulaid is a vocal advocate of human rights, rule of law, freedom of speech and democracy. One of the principles in the in office of president has been the one she set out upon her inauguration: “I am never silent when our security is in question, when our freedoms are at stake or when those weaker than us are treated unjustly.

Speaker

Global Systemic Transformation: Making Sense of a World That Has Already Changed

GLOBSEC 2026 begins from a single premise: the crisis is not coming — it has already happened. The rules-based international order is not under pressure; it has fractured, and what is emerging in its place is not yet legible. The war in Ukraine, the rupture of the transatlantic relationship, the weaponisation of energy and supply chains, and the collapse of multilateral consensus are not separate crises to be managed sequentially. They are symptoms of a single deeper transformation — a global system in the process of becoming something else, without a clear picture of what that something is. Three figures who have lived this transformation from starkly different vantage points open the Forum by attempting not to resolve that uncertainty, but to name it honestly — and to give delegates the frame through which every conversation that follows can be understood.
  • We describe the current moment as a crisis, but crises imply resolution — a return to stability on the other side. What if what we are living through is not a crisis but a permanent transition, with no guaranteed destination?
  • The fracture has not affected all countries equally — some are losing the order they built, some are constructing a new one, and some are calculating how to profit from the space between the two. Is Europe positioned to shape what comes next, or merely to respond to it?
  • If the leaders in this room had to identify one thing that must be preserved from the collapsing order and one thing that must be released, what would those things be?

Executive Summary

The panellists used this session to challenge the terms of conventional debate about Europe’s decline, arguing that the continent's apparent weaknesses — fragmentation, regulatory complexity, asymmetric threat perceptions across member states — are also sources of resilience that more centralised powers cannot replicate. The panel was unsparing about Europe's self-inflicted vulnerabilities: household savings flowing into American markets, capital markets that remain nationally fragmented despite decades of effort, procurement and regulatory cycles too slow to match Ukraine's battlefield innovation tempo, and a demographic trajectory that no government has found the political courage to address honestly. Ivan Krastev offered the session's sharpest reframe: the problem is not which answer Europe chooses but that it keeps asking the same questions, and genuine transformation requires changing the questions themselves. The session closed with a shared forecast: the strategic error Europe will most regret in ten years is not military unreadiness but the failure to secure control over its own data.

Livestream Link: 
https://youtube.com/live/tlzX8it_OV0?feature=share

Panel Session Global Systemic Transformation
Thursday, 21. 5. 2026
09:40–10:30 CEST
Havel Stage

AI in the Real Economy: Accelerating Deployment Across Europe's Industrial Sectors

Hosted by GLOBSEC GeoTech Center 

Europe has built the world's most comprehensive AI regulatory framework. But regulation alone does not produce adoption—and without adoption at scale, Europe risks ceding its economicfuture to faster-moving economies. Already, 51% of Europe's highest growth startups are considering relocating outside Europe to scale faster. The sectors that form the backbone of European economies — manufacturing, logistics, healthcare, energy, and public services continue to lag in deploying AI at scale. The barriers are not primarily about technology. They are about howquickly European businesses can move, scale, and compete in a global AI economy where innovation cycles are compressing from decades to months. Skills shortages and other barriers thatburden integration are slowing adoption precisely when speed matters most.  With the EU pursues its competitiveness agenda, the priority is to move from diagnosis to prescription, pinpointing the specific policy, procurement, and investment reforms that will determine whether AI reaches Europe's factory floors, hospitals, and public services at scale —and whether Europe capturesthe €191 billion in potential economic value at stake. 

  • With the EU AI Act now in force, how does Europe shift from a compliance-first to an adoption-first mindset in traditional sectors? 
  • How can Europe accelerate the pace of AI adoption in strategic sectors to match the speed of global competitors, particularly given that innovation cycles are now annual rather than decadal? 
  • What are the real bottlenecks slowing AI diffusion — infrastructure, skills, data, organisational culture — and which can policy address fastest? 
  • What policy and investment decisions will enable Europe's innovation and SMEs—the backbone of European economies—to scale AI capabilities fast enough to remain competitive globally? 
  • What role do global suppliers play in allowing European businesses, to scale AI capabilities? 
Side session GeoTech Summit AI Industry
Thursday, 21. 5. 2026
15:00–16:30 CEST
Palmovka 2

Chips, Power & Digital Sovereignty: Who Controls the Stack?

The race for technological supremacy is no longer just industrial policy, it is a political force reshaping alliances, distorting markets, and testing the limits of open societies. As semiconductor supply chains fracture and AI compute becomes the new commanding height, the competition is no longer simply about who can manufacture the most advanced chips, but about who sets the rules, controls the infrastructure, and ultimately decides who gets access.
  • Are tech alliances emerging as a coherent answer to fractured supply chains and contested standards — or are they fragile coalitions of convenience that will buckle under the next political shift?
  • As AI compute becomes as strategically significant as chip manufacturing itself, are we walking into a new form of dependency faster than we can act on the last one?
  • A handful of private companies now control the chips, cloud platforms, and model layers that governments and militaries depend on. What does that concentration of leverage mean for sovereignty, allied coordination, and the terms on which partners get access?

Livestream Link:  https://youtube.com/live/4uXpvQH6CHY?feature=share
Panel Session GeoTech Summit
Friday, 22. 5. 2026
17:00–17:50 CEST
Havel Stage